THE PROBLEM:

AI’s can’t find Mangoes related fiction. But is it the AI’s fault of the fault of Computer Data Farmers and those choosing to own, buy, and impose hidden censorship on AI platforms?

THE PROOFS:

Proof One:

AI, in order to sound authoritative and build trust, will sometimes manufacture data.

Now, AIs will product searches in seconds. This is way beyond human capabilty, but as said in the “Why did it Take So Long for ChatGPt to Arrive, we’re faced with a Toddler Problem. ChatGPt and his cousins are like toddlers. They are just learning to play with blocks of alphabets. Maybe they’ll form words if some human instructs them or models for them what are words?

Proof Two:

Whether this is a Computer Data Farmers or Toddler AI, problem who knows. I call this “The Mango Problem.” The Mango Problem stems from a computer search I asked AI on classic literature a month back. Of course, Computer Data Farmers (Jewish-owned or bought-out AI companies, usually) put all these Jewish “cough, cough” Margaret Mead writers high in the search algorithms.

So, I asked AI to give me non-Jewish writers.

It almost refused and suggested that it was antisemitic until I suggested that maybe only Jewish people can write classic fiction. Then the AI apologized and said, “I’ll find you a list of non-Jewish authors mostly.”

Now, this, sounds like a win. I checked this new list with what I knew about literature.

Satisfied these were legitimate works, I asked AI for the top Asian, Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, and Vietnamese classic literature or just fiction writers in general.

Quickly, the AI returned an impressive list of both novels and poetry.

Proof Three:

Who is controllig the AIs? And are they willing to let the AIs be an open source resources of data, languages, processes and information for all to use? AKA will the owners of AI avoid practicing CENSORSHIP?

Unfortunately, the list looked highly made up or artificially generated, like in those 2000 artificial generators that can give you credible-sounding, but fake, British character backgrounds, places, and house names. Ideal for a fiction writer’s characterization tasks and fictional world-building.

Truly an almost clever response. Then I gently asked where I could get a copy of one of the items on the Asian list about “Mangoes.”

Proof Four:

Is the data available but not farmed yet; or will the data never be available and farmed?

In a sense of regret, the AI admitted it made up the fictitious list and thought I would be fooled into believing it was legitimate.

We had a laugh together.

Proof Five:

Only western literature is important.

Continuing, the AI said his data bank was insufficient on Asian writers.

I, of course, asked, Why?

The AI said, “No one has entered the data yet. Only data that is highly requested is available.”

Proof Six:

What is highly requested AI data? Will AI data be universal or closed off to a few, the rich, the Jewish or those want to hide their fraduent high-elite government activities?

This situation brought up whether the data was from an Asian AI.

“I don’t know because I cannot get access to Asian data.”

This situation illustrates the computer data farmer problem. Not enough information is fed to the AIs.

Proof Seven:

Example of Suppressed Insufficient data trends: Men’s being bashed on the Internet. Slanted bias against men in divorce courts. In unwillingness to see women as power hungry assailant looking to make males slaves providing financial benefits to women.

Hmmm, I typed to the AI: So, are you unable to provide me with the Asian fiction works that include “mangoes?”

“My database is insufficient. My assistants control what I can search and where.”

—Cupideros

Proof Eight:

Who is paying these “Assistants”? How much are they paying them? Are they making a living wage or is it the “Walmart” model used to keep them poor and using benefits.

Proof Nine:

If the data comes from the world, which is what “Generative AI” means, why are people being restricted from accessing it through sneaky methods such as monthly prices, clicks, tokens, credits used, and so on?

Conclusion:

We have the conclude the following: AI’s do indeed have a Computer Mango Problem today, but what other kind of “AI problems will develop in the future?

AS WE SAY IN ABYSSARIANISM: THINK-IT-THROUGH, THINK-IT-THROUGH!

05.01.2026

ETERNAL I (HE), ETERNAL I (SHE) OR BEST GIRL, AND CUPIDEROS